Justice Munib's refusal to hear Article 63A case, Chief Justice's refusal to make the letter part of the record.
ISLAMABAD: The hearing on the
review appeals on the decision to interpret Article 63 A of the Constitution
was postponed due to Justice Muneeb Akhtar's non-appearance in the court.
When the hearing on the review
appeals on the interpretation of Article 63A started in the Supreme Court,
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Aminuddin, Justice Jamal Mandukhel and
Justice Mazhar Alam came to the courtroom, but Justice Muneeb Akhtar did not
come to the courtroom.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa
called the Attorney General to the rostrum and remarked that a larger bench was
constituted today regarding the case, the decision of the case was delivered by
a 5-member bench in the past.
Justice Muneeb Akhtar wrote a
letter to the Registrar Supreme Court, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa read the
letter of Justice Muneeb Akhtar during the hearing.
Contents of Justice Munib's letter.
Justice Muneeb Akhtar wrote in his letter,
"I am not apologizing for hearing the case. Once the bench has been
formed, the apologizing for hearing the case can only be done in the
court."
Justice Muneeb Akhtar wrote that
the Practice and Procedure Committee has constituted a bench, he cannot be a
part of the bench formed by the committee, he is not refusing to sit in the
bench, his non-joining in the bench should not be misunderstood, my letter
should be made a part of revision case record.
The Additional Attorney General
requested the Supreme Court that the bench should sit again tomorrow, while
Barrister Ali Zafar expressed reservations on the committee and said that the
committee can form a bench only when all three members are present.
63 A's case is very important, the judge's refusal to hear the case is in the court: Chief Justice.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan
remarked that it is not a tradition to make such a letter a part of the court
record, Justice Muneeb's letter cannot be a part of the court file, it would
have been appropriate if Justice Muneeb Akhtar had come to the bench and given
his opinion, I always encourage dissenting opinion. , the revision case is
pending for more than two years.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that
the case of 63 A is very important, the judge's refusal to hear the case
happens in the court, Justice Muneeb Akhtar's opinion is respected.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa
remarked that the law requires the same bench to hear the review appeal, I
replaced the former Chief Justice, Justice Aminuddin was included in place of
Justice Ijazul Ahsan, we request Justice Muneeb Akhtar. Will sit in the bench.
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa
requested Justice Muneeb Akhtar to join the bench and said that he will try to
bring Justice Muneeb Akhtar back to the bench otherwise the bench will be
reconstituted.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that
it is hoped that Justice Muneeb Akhtar will join the bench again, whether
Justice Muneeb Akhtar joins the bench or not, in both cases the case will be
heard tomorrow.
If a member does not become part of the bench at will, the court cannot stop functioning: Justice Faiz Isa.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan
said that there is an important point in the review which is affecting
governance in general. Justice Muneeb heard the cases today. Justice Muneeb
Akhtar was also present in the tea room. It should be in front of the people,
if Justice Muneeb Akhtar does not come, tomorrow other available judges will be
included in his place.
Barrister Ali Zafar said that the
meeting of the Judges Committee cannot be held if the Chief Justice and senior
judges are not included in it, on which the Chief Justice said that the law of
Parliament does not intend that there are no decisions on constitutional rights
and the Supreme Court remains silent. , if a member does not want to
participate, that is their choice, the Supreme Court cannot stop working, we
are only paid to decide cases here.
The Supreme Court adjourned the
hearing on the review appeals on the decision of interpretation of Article 63A
till 11.30 am tomorrow.
"Ex-Deputy Superintendent Adiala is not in our custody", Defense and Home Secretary's answer in the court.
Rawalpindi: Defense Secretary and
Home Secretary denied that former Deputy Superintendent of Adiala Jail Muhammad
Akram is in their custody.
Lahore High Court Rawalpindi
Bench Justice Chaudhry Abdul Aziz heard the request for the recovery of former
Deputy Superintendent Adiala Jail Muhammad Akram, in which the petitioner
Maimona Riaz appeared in the court along with her lawyer Iman Mazari while the
Defense Secretary and Interior Secretary gave a written statement. Submitted to
the court.
The public prosecutor said that
according to the statement of the two secretaries, Muhammad Akram is not in
their custody, on this the court said that Muhammad Akram had given a statement
regarding the recovery and that he would take action if he was in their
custody.
The court said that the defense
secretary and the interior secretary should also submit their affidavits in the
court.
On this occasion, the lawyer
petitioner Iman Mazari said that Muhammad Akram's family has been evicted from
the official residence, on which the court has asked the jail administration to
respond to the vacating the official residence.
Former Deputy Superintendent of Adiala Jail's network was caught on the facilitation of founder PTI.
Rawalpindi: Former Deputy
Superintendent of Adiala Jail network was caught on the facilitation of PTI
founder Imran Khan.
According to the sources,
questioning of 2 more officers of Adiala Jail has been started on the suspicion
of Imran Khan's alleged facilitation in the jail. Jail lived near Akram.
Sources say that on the information received from Deputy Superintendent Muhammad Akram, 6 more employees will be questioned, 2 orderlies of Muhammad Akram, 3 warders and the head warder will be questioned, all the employees are considered close to Muhammad Akram. are
Sources say that evidence of
WhatsApp usage on numbers from 3 European countries has also been found,
Muhammad Akram is believed to be close to PTI leader Zulfi Bukhari and a former
provincial minister.
According to the sources,
Muhammad Akram is accused of sending messages and facilitating for PTI founder.
But the meeting of the jail administration is likely to be held today.
Accused of facilitating Imran Khan in jail, investigation started against another officer, phone records obtained.
After Deputy Superintendent
Muhammad Akram, an investigation has been started against another jail officer
for facilitating Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder Imran Khan in Adiala Jail.
According to the sources, the
security agencies have completed the interrogation of Assistant Superintendent
Bilal and obtained the mobile phone records of Assistant Superintendent Bilal.
Sources said that Deputy
Superintendent Muhammad Akram and Assistant Superintendent Bilal Bani had
access to the cell of PTI. The Deputy Superintendent was also seen whispering
to Bani PTI in the court room.
Sources say that the two officers
are also accused of giving mobile access to founder PTI.
Accused of facilitating Imran Khan, the Deputy Superintendent of Adiala Jail was detained.
Security agencies detained Deputy
Superintendent of Adiala Jail Muhammad Akram.
According to the sources, the
security agencies detained the Deputy Superintendent of Adiala Jail, Muhammad
Akram.
Sources said that Deputy
Superintendent Muhammad Akram Parbani is accused of facilitating PTI and was
taken into custody for exceeding his powers.
Sources say that investigations
are going on with the Deputy Superintendent on behalf of the security agencies,
the Deputy Superintendent is also accused of secretly sending messages to the
founder of PTI.
According to the sources, IG
Prisons Punjab was informed by the security agencies, departmental action will
also be taken against Deputy Superintendent Muhammad Akram after the
investigation.
Sources say that Deputy
Superintendent Adiala Jail Muhammad Akram was already removed from the post.
It should be noted that the
founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Imran Khan is currently imprisoned in
Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail.
0 Comments